Probably not, but I’ll be tuning in to his on-line Q&A at noon Eastern Time to find out if he comes clean about what the Washington Post actually reported about the bogus GOP “talking points memo.”

You have to hand it to the Post — their CBS-esque tactic of stonewalling and delaying a few badly-needed corrections is paying off to a degree. In brief review, the Post:

1) Made a big to-do about a one-page, unsigned political memo allegedly passed out to Republican Senators that had no chain of custody, no cover sheet, and was riddled with grammatical and factual errors. Furthermore, no proof exists that any GOP Senators received the memo — Democratic staffers were the only ones seen with it.

2) Repeatedly claimed that Post stories never stated that GOP leaders wrote and distributed the memo. The blogosphere essentially caught them in a lie.

3) Took almost two weeks to fully address the issue, and refuses to even run a small correction on information that is obviously false. Even if the Post can cough up evidence that the memo is real, the Post needs to run corrections for columns in which it wrongly defended the original stories.

Now, I said the stonewalling tactic was “paying off to a degree.” Aside from a handful of blogs, no one seems willing or able to hold the Post’s feet to the fire. My theory?

People are not making as big a deal over media errors post-Memogate because mistakes, bias and arrogance are exactly what they expect from the mainstream press. Getting it wrong and insisting repeatedly that it’s true fits the average American’s perception of the press like a glove.

While we’re waiting for The Great Whitewash to continue, take the time to read this Daily Standard article by Scott Johnson of Powerline that updates us on what may have happened at the Post.

Also, it seems that the cracks are beginning to form: Michelle Malkin notes that the St. Louis Post-Dispatch runs a correction for its Post story.